Search:

Gambling Gaming Casino Betting Vegas Online Casino Blackjack Cards Poker Roulette Gamble Slots Addiction

George Galloway vs. U.S Senate (5/17/05)

Gambling Videos
Gambling Videos Gambling Videos
Gambling Videos

British MP Galloway, falsely accused of taking bribes from Saddam Hussein, tears the US Senate a new one in this exhilarating MSNBC clip that grows more apropos every day.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: Chris1260

Length: 03:55
Rating: 4.88
Views: 375137

Tags: Bush  Galloway  George  Hussein  Iraq  Saddam  Senate  UK  War  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

DLPBurke (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
u dick
DLPBurke (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
that sounds silly but you are right. The man is insane and so are most muslims
DLPBurke (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
how about mr gallowway tell us why it is always muslims at the centre of trouble? Galloway has a lot to say but he doesn't like people questioning his lies and his opinions. If he thinks the world can go on ignoring attrocities in the name of allah he has another think coming. He says he stands for truth and respect but have any of you seen him in a debate? he ignores interrups and refuses to listen. He is as intolerant as islam is. So it figures
JACKtheRIPP3R189 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yawn did you even read what was posted? The line "learn some basic grammar" contains no grammatical flaws. I know you are incapable of learning from the first time round so i was expecting this. Do you see those little quotation marks around MY so called "grammatical errors"? That means i was quoting someone, in this case you (with the exception of the word "AN"). So really you just made yourself look silly, but you dont seem to mind doing that.
JACKtheRIPP3R189 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes you did call it "hypochite" read your own post, straight from the horse's (or donkey's) mouth. You just shot down your own case (par for the course in your case). He said something in 2002 then said something else in 2003, he was merely wrong in his first comment then changed his mind based on what we saw. I guess it isn't hypocritical when Galloway yaps about imperialism then whines about how he misses the Soviet Union (which was a true empire). Double standard much?
JACKtheRIPP3R189 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Dont give me that nonsense, they were all to be found in one article of Norman Finkelstein's. Even if you didn't know it thats where this comes from. No they werent, i'm pretty sure The oil quote was made about the first gulf war. You keep acting as though WMDs are the only thing that anyone could possibly have on Saddam Hussein. Are you naive or just a little slow, or perhaps both? You fail again.
JackKrauserReborn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
George Galloway is an intelligent guy, but sometimes he can be a right douche-bag.
poyani (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Perhaps you need a refreshing of what the word "hypocrite" means or a "hypochite" as you call it." I'll explain it to you through an example. A person whose statement condemning other people's online grammar (even including the line "learn some basic grammar") contains many basic grammatical errors is a Hitchocrite. "Firstly its "AN iraq war supporter". learn some basic grammar." Mistakes Continued! 4. Learn There are others but they take time to explain. LOL!
poyani (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Amusing that your quotations come all from one article, and funnier that none of them are in context." The quotes were not from one article and all of them were in context!!! And I just gave you a sampler of Hitchens' Hitchocracy. Take for example his most widely used quote with respect to god "That which can be presented without proof, can be rejected without proof." He was pushing the WMD BS without proof at the same time as making statements like this. Now that's Hitchocracy!
poyani (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I don't call it "hypochite". I use the word Hitchocrite to to describe an extreme form of hypocracy that only Hitchens seems capable of. The Hitchens quotes that I posted were not the result of him changing his mind. In 2002 while arguing for the war he said that Saddam's regime was close to falling anyways so we should invade. In 2003 he said that Saddam would not fall if not invaded. Using two contradictory facts to prove the same point, now that's Hitchocracy!!!

Gambling Videos © 2007 All Rights Reserved.